<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xml:base="http://eviscerati.org" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
 <title>Eviscerati.org: All Hail the Eviscerati</title>
 <link>http://eviscerati.org/rss/rss.xml</link>
 <description>Eviscerati.org customized RSS Feed</description>
 <language>en</language>
<item>
 <title>Obligatory Snarky Title</title>
 <link>http://eviscerati.org/node/38</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/files/images-evorg/Content Needed.png&quot; title=&quot;Witty inside joke here&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t think these guys are quite ready to go live just yet.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://eviscerati.org/node/38#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://eviscerati.org/taxonomy/term/3">Internet Culture</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 21:34:09 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Christopher Wright</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">38 at http://eviscerati.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Ask.com Completely Misses The Point</title>
 <link>http://eviscerati.org/node/37</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;Today&#039;s examination of cultural fluff comes courtesy of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com&quot;&gt;YouTube&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://ask.com&quot;&gt;Ask.com&lt;/a&gt; has decided it&#039;s tired of playing second fiddle to other, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com&quot;&gt;more&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.yahoo.com&quot;&gt;successful&lt;/a&gt; search engines and has decided to start a campaign to let people know exactly how good their search engine is:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;youtube&quot;&gt;&lt;object width=&quot;425&quot; height=&quot;350&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;param name=&quot;movie&quot; value=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/BUhxU6dPLPE&quot;&gt;&lt;/param&gt;
&lt;param name=&quot;wmode&quot; value=&quot;transparent&quot;&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;embed src=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/BUhxU6dPLPE&quot; type=&quot;application/x-shockwave-flash&quot; wmode=&quot;transparent&quot; width=&quot;425&quot; height=&quot;350&quot;&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/object&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--break--&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Algorithm&lt;/strong&gt; is Ask.com&#039;s secret weapon against Google and Yahoo!  It is so incredibly powerful, so mind-numbingly sophisticated, that all other search algorithms are rendered utterly impotent by comparison:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;youtube&quot;&gt;&lt;object width=&quot;425&quot; height=&quot;350&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;param name=&quot;movie&quot; value=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/PLCrDNImDQw&quot;&gt;&lt;/param&gt;
&lt;param name=&quot;wmode&quot; value=&quot;transparent&quot;&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;embed src=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/PLCrDNImDQw&quot; type=&quot;application/x-shockwave-flash&quot; wmode=&quot;transparent&quot; width=&quot;425&quot; height=&quot;350&quot;&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/object&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;The Algorithm&lt;/strong&gt; is mighty. It is on the very cutting edge of search technology, making it capable of some of the most &lt;strong&gt;wonderous feats ever imagined by man.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;... like finding half naked women on the internet.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;youtube&quot;&gt;&lt;object width=&quot;425&quot; height=&quot;350&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;param name=&quot;movie&quot; value=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/LDoxONwrFug&quot;&gt;&lt;/param&gt;
&lt;param name=&quot;wmode&quot; value=&quot;transparent&quot;&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;embed src=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/LDoxONwrFug&quot; type=&quot;application/x-shockwave-flash&quot; wmode=&quot;transparent&quot; width=&quot;425&quot; height=&quot;350&quot;&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/object&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;... or finding websites about tabloid celebrities.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;youtube&quot;&gt;&lt;object width=&quot;425&quot; height=&quot;350&quot;&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;param name=&quot;movie&quot; value=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/0RVoGWcpzy8&quot;&gt;&lt;/param&gt;
&lt;param name=&quot;wmode&quot; value=&quot;transparent&quot;&gt;&lt;/param&gt;&lt;embed src=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/v/0RVoGWcpzy8&quot; type=&quot;application/x-shockwave-flash&quot; wmode=&quot;transparent&quot; width=&quot;425&quot; height=&quot;350&quot;&gt;&lt;/embed&gt;&lt;/object&gt;&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As clever as these ads may be, does it bother anyone else that Ask.com is essentially touting what it claims to be &lt;strong&gt;the most sophisticated search algorithm known to man&lt;/strong&gt; as a way to find pinups on the web?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is there a search engine on the web that &lt;strong&gt;can&#039;t&lt;/strong&gt; do this?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Let&#039;s start with the Internet at it&#039;s most basic: from the moment college students were allowed to use the Internet -- in fact, in all likelihood, even &lt;strong&gt;before&lt;/strong&gt; college students were allowed to use the Internet -- there have been pictures of naked, half-naked, somehwat naked, provacatively clothed, provacatively unclothed, and other variations and combinations of clothed and unclothed women for the &lt;strong&gt;satiation of purient indulgence&lt;/strong&gt;. It&#039;s not difficult to find these pictures on the web -- in fact, it&#039;s possible to find them &lt;strong&gt;without using a search engine at all&lt;/strong&gt;. Thanks to the Internet, pornography can now survive &lt;strong&gt;Nuclear Armageddon&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And searching for celebrities? Please show me a search engine that &lt;strong&gt;can&#039;t&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/search?source=ig&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;q=kato+kaelin&amp;amp;btnG=Google+Search&quot;&gt;search&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dogpile.com/info.dogpl/search/web/kato%252Bkaelin/1/-/1/-/-/-/1/-/-/-/1/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/417/top/-/-/-/1&quot;&gt;for &lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=kato+kaelin&amp;amp;fr=yfp-t-501&amp;amp;toggle=1&amp;amp;cop=mss&amp;amp;ei=UTF-8&quot;&gt;articles&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://search.msn.com/results.aspx?q=kato+kaelin&amp;amp;FORM=MSNH&quot;&gt;about&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://search.lycos.com/?query=kato+kaelin&amp;amp;x=0&amp;amp;y=0&quot;&gt;Kato&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.altavista.com/web/results?itag=ody&amp;amp;q=kato+kaelin&amp;amp;kgs=1&amp;amp;kls=0&quot;&gt;Kaelin&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&amp;amp;q=neil+diamond&amp;amp;btnG=Search&quot;&gt;Or &lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=gene+simmons&amp;amp;fr=yfp-t-501&amp;amp;toggle=1&amp;amp;cop=mss&amp;amp;ei=UTF-8&quot;&gt;anyone&lt;/a&gt;    &lt;a href=&quot;http://search.lycos.com/?query=johnny+rotten&amp;amp;x=0&amp;amp;y=0&quot;&gt;else&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://search.live.com/results.aspx?q=jello+biafra&amp;amp;mkt=en-us&amp;amp;FORM=LIVSOP&amp;amp;go.x=0&amp;amp;go.y=0&amp;amp;go=Search&quot;&gt;that&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.google.com/search?source=ig&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;q=siouxie+sioux&amp;amp;btnG=Google+Search&quot;&gt;comes&lt;/a&gt;  &lt;a href=&quot;http://search.yahoo.com/search?p=chuck+norris&amp;amp;fr=yfp-t-501&amp;amp;toggle=1&amp;amp;cop=mss&amp;amp;ei=UTF-8&quot;&gt;to&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://search.lycos.com/?query=engelbert+humperdinck&quot;&gt;mind&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I understand that what with the overwhelming success of Google, there is really only room for one or two other search engines to get any kind of mainstream recognition at all, and one of those other search engines is probably always going to be Yahoo!  Ask.com wants punchy commercials that people remember, but I&#039;m not convinced that ultimately people will remember the right things: in it&#039;s eagerness to imprint itself on the psyche of internet users all over the world it created two advertisements that essentially said &quot;look how strong I am -- &lt;strong&gt;I can pick up that box of tissue paper with just one hand&lt;/strong&gt;!&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;How powerful is the Algorithm? It&#039;s powerful enough to allow you to search for &lt;strong&gt;trivialities&lt;/strong&gt;. Not, I think, the impression that Ask.com was trying to make.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But maybe I&#039;m wrong. Maybe they aren&#039;t trying to compete with Google. Maybe they&#039;re trying to compete with &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/He-man&quot;&gt;Wikipedia&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://eviscerati.org/node/37#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://eviscerati.org/taxonomy/term/3">Internet Culture</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 06 Jul 2007 04:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Christopher Wright</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">37 at http://eviscerati.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Choose Your Own Misadventure</title>
 <link>http://eviscerati.org/node/36</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;/files/images-evorg/text.png&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You wake up. It is dark.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;code&gt;::LOOK&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It is very dark. You might get eaten by a Grue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;code&gt;::GET UP&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The pillow slides off your face as you force yourself to sit up in your bed. Sunlight streams in through the tiny window of your bedroom. Apparently it is not as dark as you originally thought.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--break--&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;code&gt;::LOOK&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sunlight streams in through the tiny window of your bedroom. A pair of worn slippers sit on the bare hardwood floor, and a threadbare bathrobe drapes across the back of the chair sitting in front of your computer desk.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You see:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A pillow.&lt;br /&gt;
A bed.&lt;br /&gt;
A worn pair of slippers.&lt;br /&gt;
A threadbare bathrobe.&lt;br /&gt;
A chair.&lt;br /&gt;
A computer desk.&lt;br /&gt;
A closet door.&lt;br /&gt;
A bedroom door.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;code&gt;::STAND&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You stand unsteadily on your bed. Your boxspring mattress creaks uneasily. You feel somewhat foolish.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;code&gt;::SIT&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You sit back on your bed, feeling a bit more secure.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;code&gt;::GET OUT OF BED&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You get out of bed and stand on the cold hardwood floor. You shiver in the chilly morning air. Your feet are freezing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;code&gt;::LOOK&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sunlight streams in through the tiny window of your bedroom. A pair of worn slippers sit on the bare hardwood floor, and a threadbare bathrobe drapes across the back of the chair sitting in front of your computer desk.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You see:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A pillow.&lt;br /&gt;
A bed.&lt;br /&gt;
A worn pair of slippers.&lt;br /&gt;
A threadbare bathrobe.&lt;br /&gt;
A chair.&lt;br /&gt;
A computer desk.&lt;br /&gt;
A closet door.&lt;br /&gt;
A bedroom door.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You are very cold!&lt;br /&gt;
Your feet are freezing!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;code&gt;::GET SLIPPERS&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You pick up the slippers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You are very cold!&lt;br /&gt;
Your feet are freezing!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;code&gt;::WEAR SLIPPERS&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Your feet slide into the slippers comfortably. They are a little thin, but the floor no longer feels as cold as it had.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;code&gt;::WEAR BATHROBE&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You do not have a bathrobe.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;code&gt;::GET BATHROBE&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You pick up the bathrobe.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;code&gt;::WEAR BATHROBE&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You put on the bathrobe. It has seen better days, but you feel much better.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;code&gt;::LOOK DESK&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The desk appears to have a computer on it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;code&gt;::EXAMINE DESK&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You are too far away from the desk to do this.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;code&gt;::GO DESK&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I do not understand this command.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;code&gt;::APPROACH DESK&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I do not understand this command.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;code&gt;::SIT&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You sit on the floor.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;code&gt;::STAND&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You stand up.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;code&gt;::LOOK CHAIR&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It is a chair. It looks as if someone could sit in it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;code&gt;::SIT CHAIR&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You walk over to the chair and sit in it. The chair squeaks softly as you turn in it to face the desk.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;code&gt;::LOOK DESK&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The desk appears to have a computer on it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;code&gt;::EXAMINE DESK&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The desk is a standard computer desk made out of cheap metal and particle board. On top of the desk is a Norbist 4000 Personal Computer running the very latest version of Ubersoft Nifty Doorways Verandah.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;code&gt;::USE COMPUTER&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;How shall I use the computer?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;code&gt;::LOOK COMPUTER&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The computer is currently turned off.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;code&gt;::TURN ON COMPUTER&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You press the power button on the computer. The computer beeps, and suddenly words and numbers scroll up the monitor at speeds too fast for the human eye to track.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;code&gt;::WAIT&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The computer finishes POST, then a splash screen for Ubersoft Nifty Doorways Verandah appears.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;code&gt;::LOOK SPLASH SCREEN&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It is very nifty.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;code&gt;::WAIT&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The splash screen disappears. The words &quot;loading device drivers&quot; flash on the screen.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;code&gt;::WAIT&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The words &quot;loading device drivers&quot; disappear. The words &quot;loading DRM modules&quot; flash on the screen.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;code&gt;::WAIT&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The words &quot;loading DRM modules&quot; disappear. The words &quot;loading antivirus modules&quot; flash on the screen.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;code&gt;::WAIT&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The words &quot;loading antivirus modules&quot; disappears. The words &quot;loading company-mandated keylogging spyware module&quot; flash on the screen.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;code&gt;::WAIT&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;All text disappears on the screen. A flashing keyprompt blinks urgently in the upper left-hand corner of the screen.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;code&gt;::WAIT&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A flashing keyprompt blinks urgently in the upper left-hand corner of the screen.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;code&gt;::WAIT&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A flashing keyprompt blinks urgently in the upper left-hand corner of the screen.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;code&gt;::WAIT&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A flashing keyprompt blinks urgently in the upper left-hand corner of the screen.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;code&gt;::WAIT&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A flashing keyprompt blinks urgently in the upper left-hand corner of the screen.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;code&gt;::WAIT&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A flashing keyprompt blinks urgently in the upper left-hand corner of the screen.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;code&gt;::WAIT&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The flashing keyprompt is replaced with a splash screen for Nifty Doorways Verandah.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;code&gt;::WAIT&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An hourglass appears in front of the splash screen for Nifty Doorways Verandah.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;code&gt;::WAIT&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The splash screen for Nifty Doorways Verandah dissappears. In its place is an intricately detailed, beautifully colored and textured wallpaper. A carefully sculpted login screen appears.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;code&gt;::LOG IN&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t know what you mean by LOG IN.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;code&gt;::LOOK LOGIN SCREEN&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The login screen has two fields, one for your user name and one for your password.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You see:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;An OK button.&lt;br /&gt;
A Cancel button.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;code&gt;::TYPE USER NAME&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You type your user name into the first field.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;code&gt;::TYPE PASSWORD&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You type your password into the second field.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;code&gt;::WAIT&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Time passes...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;code&gt;::CLICK OK.&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You click the OK button with your mouse. The screen goes black.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;code&gt;::WAIT&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Time passes...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;code&gt;::WAIT&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Time passes...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;code&gt;::WAIT&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The screen flickers once, then the Ubersoft Nifty Doorways Verandah user desktop appears.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;code&gt;::LOOK DESKTOP&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is an icon for Ubersoft Internet Conquistador on the desktop.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;code&gt;::CLICK ICON&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The icon for Ubersoft Internet Conquistador is now highlighted.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;code&gt;::DOUBLECLICK ICON&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The browser window for Ubersoft Internet Conquistador opens. Immediately twelve other browser windows open.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;code&gt;::LOOK CONQUISTADOR&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ubersoft Internet Conquistador represents the cutting edge in web browsing technology. At the top of the browser window is an address bar.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;code&gt;::TYPE UBERSOFT.NET IN ADDRESS BAR&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You type ubersoft.net in the Address Bar. Currently the site appears to be nothing but text.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;code&gt;::READ SITE&lt;/code&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The text begins &quot;You wake up...&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You are trapped in a recursive loop. Eventually you starve to death.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;YOU HAVE LOST.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Current score: 0/300&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://eviscerati.org/node/36#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://eviscerati.org/taxonomy/term/4">Miscellaneous</category>
 <pubDate>Sat, 30 Jun 2007 15:15:25 -0500</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Christopher Wright</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">36 at http://eviscerati.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>&quot;Solitaire is all anyone will ever need&quot;</title>
 <link>http://eviscerati.org/node/28</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.brunothebandit.com/d/19990719.html&quot;&gt;&lt;img id=&quot;image77&quot; alt=&quot;Bruno the Bandit, by Ian McDonald&quot; src=&quot;http://eviscerati.org/files/images-evorg/2007/01/19990719a.png&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
From &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.brunothebandit.com&quot;&gt;Bruno the Bandit&lt;/a&gt;, by Ian McDonald&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.laptop.org/&quot;&gt;One Laptop Per Child&lt;/a&gt; is, in my opinion, a laudible and worthy goal... to create low-cost laptops that are then distributed for free to children in developing countries.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is a worthwhile effort. There are people who feel the project is a waste of time, and that people should be focusing on other, more basic problems, but I believe that focusing on any one problem to the exclusion of all others won&#039;t solve anything. OLPC won&#039;t save the world but that doesn&#039;t mean it won&#039;t do good things.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That said, sometimes I worry about what exactly people involved in the project expect the children are going to get out of it. Take, for example, the following quote:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;&quot;A child doesn&#039;t want to play the latest video games. He wants to be able to read a book.&quot;&lt;br /&gt;
-Michalis Bletsas, OLPC official, as quoted in &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.linuxtoday.com/infrastructure/2007010902326NWHWEV&quot;&gt;Linux Today&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This quote is offered as an explanation as to why the laptop isn&#039;t powerful enough to play the latest and greatest games available on the market today, and it makes me want to bang my head against the wall until I lose consciousness, just to give me a moment of sweet respite from the silliness of the idea.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--break--&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are good reasons why the laptop in question &lt;strong&gt;shouldn&#039;t&lt;/strong&gt; be able to play the latest and greatest games. The most significant is that it&#039;s designed to use as little power as possible so that you can use a hand crank (actually, it seems to be more like a rip-cord) to power it up for short periods of time -- this automatically rules out the power hungry high-end processors on the market today. And it&#039;s perfectly reasonable, given that limitation alone, that it be designed for a more utilitarian purpose. Add to that the attempt to make building such a machine as cheap as possible, which once again rules out the latest and greatest processors on the market, and you have a legitimate case for focusing on your primary purpose -- building a machine to be used for education -- and eschewing fancy extras like supporting cutting edge 3d graphics capabilities.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But to suggest that children wouldn&#039;t &lt;strong&gt;want&lt;/strong&gt; to play games, given the opportunity?&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;You know, when I was growing up I loved books. I was what some would describe a &quot;bookworm.&quot; I read as many books as I could find.  But I was a lot more likely to stay up until 3 or 4 in the morning playing Ultima III than I was reading a book. Given the choice between playing a new game and reading a book, I could have gone in either direction.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Maybe children in developing countries are substantially different in temperament from children in developed countries, and they hunger for knowledge while scorning digital entertainment, but I&#039;d be willing to put money down that this isn&#039;t the case. Games are &lt;strong&gt;fun&lt;/strong&gt;. I don&#039;t know why anyone would think that children aren&#039;t interested in having fun.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It should be enough, when asked why their laptops won&#039;t play World of Warcraft, to say &quot;we&#039;re building an educational machine, not a gaming machine. To make it a good educational machine that works in any number of challenging environments, sacrifices had to be made.&quot; Implying that children would be &lt;strong&gt;uninterested&lt;/strong&gt; in such games if they were unavailable reflects a philosophy about human beings that strikes me as unrealistic at best.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://eviscerati.org/node/28#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://eviscerati.org/taxonomy/term/6">Technology</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jan 2007 09:49:04 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Christopher Wright</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">28 at http://eviscerati.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>What Bubble Are We Talking, Here?</title>
 <link>http://eviscerati.org/node/27</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gpf-comics.com/d/20050515.html&quot;&gt;&lt;img id=&quot;image74&quot; alt=&quot;General Protection Fault, by Jeff Darlington&quot; src=&quot;http://eviscerati.org/files/images-evorg/2006/12/gpf20050515wmv-n.jpg&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gpf-comics.com&quot;&gt;General Protection Fault&lt;/a&gt;, by Jeff Darlington.  Now &lt;strong&gt;that&#039;s&lt;/strong&gt; when you&#039;ll know there&#039;s a bubble...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This will a gentle cut, a minor nick if you will -- both because of the approaching holiday, when my thoughts ought to be focused on Love, Joy, Peace and GoodWill Towards Man, and also because I think the transgressor in this particular instance is more guilty of being too close to the perceived problem than he is of any kind of egregious journalistic excess.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That said, this caught my attention because it made the lists on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.slashdot.org&quot;&gt;Slashdot&lt;/a&gt;, and even the briefest episodes innocuous hyperventilation can suck all the air out of a room if you stuff enough people in it and get them to start hyperventillating at the same time.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--break--&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So, in brief:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.slashdot.org&quot;&gt;Slashdot&lt;/a&gt; posted a news article entitled &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://linux.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/12/22/1445257&quot;&gt;Has the Desktop Linux Bubble Burst?&lt;/a&gt;&quot; which refers to an article on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.osnews.com&quot;&gt;OSNews.com&lt;/a&gt; entitled &quot;&lt;a href=&quot;http://osnews.com/story.php/16783/Has-the-Desktop-Linux-Bubble-Burst&quot;&gt;Has the Linux Desktop Bubble Burst?&lt;/a&gt;&quot; writen by a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.osnews.com/editor.php?editors_id=11&quot;&gt;guy&lt;/a&gt; who wonders, essentially, if maybe the Linux Desktop &quot;bubble&quot; has in fact &quot;burst.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The article points out that development for the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gnome.org&quot;&gt;GNOME&lt;/a&gt; and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kde.org&quot;&gt;KDE&lt;/a&gt; desktops have slowed since 2002, when the latest full dot releases for each were released (3.0 for KDE, 2.0 for GNOME) and then follows that up with &quot;not much has happened since then,&quot; notes the introduction of very sophisticated desktops in Apple&#039;s OS X and Microsoft&#039;s Windows Vista, and bemoans that Linux may be falling behind in the desktop world.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Specifically he uses the terms &quot;bubble&quot; and &quot;burst&quot; -- the very combination of words that was used to describe the crash and burn of &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dot-com_bubble&quot;&gt;Dot-com speculation&lt;/a&gt; at the turn of the 21st century, and is being used right now to describe the eventual downfall of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.scripting.com/2006/11/28.html#bubbleBurst20&quot;&gt;Web 2.0 speculation&lt;/a&gt;, and will inevitably be used to describe the downfall of any kind of &lt;a href=&quot;http://uk.builder.com/programming/php/0,39030003,39260197,00.htm&quot;&gt;popular technology trend you can think of&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But bubbles and bursting are metaphors used to describe hype-driven phenomena.  The hype causes the bubble to expand, and expand, and expand, until the hype exceeds the bubble&#039;s capacity to contain it and then it disperses into nothingness.  The Dot com bubble burst because there were too many stupid people doing stupid things on the web, and investors could no longer ignore that they were throwing money at idiots.  The Linux desktop, on the other hand, is &lt;strong&gt;not&lt;/strong&gt; driven by hype -- it is driven by necessity.  People who develop for GNOME and KDE don&#039;t do it because they want stock options, it&#039;s because they want a good, stable, working Linux desktop.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And unlike the Dot-com fiasco, where talented programmers were paid too much money to develop ecommerce applications that allowed you to buy shoes for your neighbor&#039;s goldfish online, development has been focused on mostly realitic goals and has borne fruit.  KDE 3.0 was a substantial improvement over 2.0, which was itself a signficant step up from 1.0 -- but KDE 3.2, 3.4, and 3.5 were all important dot releases (sorry 3.3, I don&#039;t remember a thing about you).  Linux is the only thing I use on my laptop (my primary computer) and the problems I have with it have nothing to do with the desktop and everything to do with device drivers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I don&#039;t see the problem the author is describing, and I wonder if he really sees what he &lt;strong&gt;thinks&lt;/strong&gt; he sees, or if he&#039;s seeing something else entirely.  There is a difference in kind between &quot;hype&quot; and &quot;excitement&quot; -- I&#039;ll freely grant when each new version of a Linux desktop is released there&#039;s a fair amount of excitement in the community (and a fair amount of sniping -- but hey, that&#039;s computers for you) but we have yet to see any of the silliness that is so prevalent with hype. We get &quot;hey, we created a dialog that lets you set up a printer!&quot; instead of &quot;now you can use your wireless network application to turn off your refrigerator!&quot;(1)  We get &quot;our built in browser has one of the most advanced and complete implementations of CSS-2 currently available&quot; instead of &quot;this shiny, glossy title bar will make you want to lick the screen!&quot;(2)&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There are no Linux desktop startups buying $500 chairs, there are no Linux desktop-themed knicknacks being sold on eBay for thousands of dollars, there are no Linux desktop board games. No one has sold their stock options associated with GNOME or KDE in order to become ridiculously rich, and none of the Linux desktop programmers have become firmly ensconced in the world of the online punditocracy. Neither KDE nor GNOME can realistically be considered a &quot;lifestyle choice&quot; -- all KDE/GNOME flamewars are fought over old ideological differences and current conflicting development goals.  And there is no sprawling economic infrastructure that depends entirely on the success or failure of the Linux desktop. In short, there is no bubble, and so there is nothing to burst.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Is it reasonable to worry about GNOME&#039;s loss of support and manpower? Yes.  Is it understandible for people to wonder about the effect SuSE switching from KDE to GNOME will have on KDE development? Yes.  But taking those concerns and turning them into a doomsday scenario where Linux desktop development collapses due to an overinjection of rabid hype -- no.  Not reasonable in the slightest.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;--------&lt;br /&gt;
(1) I&#039;m not saying those applications don&#039;t exist for Linux, I&#039;m just saying they&#039;re not used as a selling point for a user interface.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;(2) Oh Mr. Jobs, why did you endorse such poor hygienic behavior when we are already so challenged in that arena?  Thousands of computer users licking their monitors... my soul cries out in horror.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://eviscerati.org/node/27#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://eviscerati.org/taxonomy/term/6">Technology</category>
 <pubDate>Fri, 22 Dec 2006 17:48:10 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Christopher Wright</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">27 at http://eviscerati.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>I Predict 2007</title>
 <link>http://eviscerati.org/node/26</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://boxjamsdoodle.com/d/20040122.html&quot;&gt;&lt;img id=&quot;image68&quot; alt=&quot;Boxjam&#039;s Doodle, by the Great Blue One&quot; src=&quot;http://eviscerati.org/files/images-evorg/2006/12/bj20040122.gif&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://boxjamsdoodle.com&quot;&gt;Boxjam&#039;s Doodle&lt;/a&gt;, by the Great Blue One&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The last month of the year is a time for quiet, thoughtful introspection and cautiously optimistic speculation on the year to come.  Unless you&#039;re writing for a computer magazine, in which case introspection be damned -- and as far as speculation goes, caution is for techno-sissies.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In that vein I have decided to put forward my own list of predictions for the year 2007.  Ten of them, to be exact: and I promise that my list of predictions is every bit as reliable as any other predictions list you&#039;ll read this month.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;So without further ado:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;EVISCERATI.ORG&#039;S TOP TEN PREDICTIONS FOR 2007&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--break--&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;1. Computers will continue to require electricity&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Despite dire warnings about global warming, the thinning ozone layer, the increase of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, depleted oil supplies, rising gas prices, and political turmoil in the Middle East, computer manufacturers will continue to refuse to explore ways of liberating the computer from its ever-present yoke, a power supply.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Electricity has always been a part of computing -- it predates the introduction of the IBM PC 5100 in 1975. Why the computer industry insists on being shackled to technology that has been present since &lt;a href=&quot;http://inventors.about.com/library/inventors/blbattery.htm&quot;&gt;1800&lt;/a&gt; is beyond me.  Surely after all this time our best and brightest can come up with a way to make computers work without relying on the laws of physics.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;2. Web 3.0 will take the consulting market by storm&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Web 3.0, the successor to Web 2.0, will make waves and become the Next Big Thing to hit the internet scene.  Companies will hire a new wave of internet-savvy consultants in order to help them understand how best to integrate all the new Web 3.0 buzzwords and catch-phrases into their corporate patois. One of the biggest advantages of pushing Web 3.0, of course, is that it will be no longer necessary to try to explain exactly what the heck Web 2.0 is. Unfortunately, the new problem will be trying to explain what Web 3.0 is -- no-one will know, although vague references to &quot;rounded corners on web sites&quot; will still be a part of it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;3. Richard Stallman will piss somebody off&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Stallman&quot;&gt;Richard Stallman&lt;/a&gt;, founder of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fsf.org&quot;&gt;Free Software Foundation&lt;/a&gt; and father of the free software movement, will say something that will piss someone off.  It will probably have something to do with &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_Rights_Management&quot;&gt;DRM&lt;/a&gt;, though it may also involve an improper use of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gpl&quot;&gt;GPL&lt;/a&gt;, or why people who don&#039;t use the GPL are a pack of immoral bastard gits.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The whole sordid affair will be posted on &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.slashdot.org&quot;&gt;Slashdot&lt;/a&gt;, and the comments section will be split 45-45-10 between &quot;Thank God Richard Stallman is here to protect us,&quot; &quot;Thank God Richard Stallman is irrelevant and can&#039;t do us any harm,&quot; and &quot;There is no God, Cthulhu is My Master.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;4. Computer Journalists Will Make More Lists&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.crn.com/&quot;&gt;CRN&lt;/a&gt;, the news site that provides vital information for VARs and Technology Integrators, will give Microsoft Vista it&#039;s &quot;Best Operating System of 2007&quot; award in its 2007 Top 10 List next December.  This will occur even as it acknowledges that it already gave Vista the Best Operating System of 2006 award in December of 2006.  The rationale for this award will be that &quot;it&#039;s really the only game in town.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When asked what criteria they used in order to determine how many games were in town, the response will be &quot;Operating Systems created by Microsoft.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.infoworld.com&quot;&gt;Infoworld&lt;/a&gt;, the news site that covers Information Technology news, will publish a December aticle with the title &quot;InfoWorld&#039;s 8 predictions for &#039;08.&quot;  It will be filled with hockey references and contain five actual predictions, three of which are &quot;Microsoft Vista&#039;s first patch will be the single most defining moment of the new year, including the Presidential Elections,&quot; &quot;Apple will go bankrupt because of iTunes,&quot; and &quot;Apple will become evne more rich because of iTunes.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.dvorak.org/blog/&quot;&gt;John Dvorak&lt;/a&gt; will predict that Microsoft will frame Richard Stallman for conpsiracy to commit terrorist acts against the United States in order to discredit the Free Software movement.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;5. Microsoft will frame Richard Stallman for conspiracy to commit terrorist acts against the United States in order to discredit the Free Software movement&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In semi-related news, John Dvorak will get a substantial raise.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;6. Linus Torvalds will call someone or something &quot;stupid&quot; and &quot;a collossal waste of time&quot;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linus_Torvalds&quot;&gt;Linus Torvalds&lt;/a&gt;, the progenitor and mostly-benevolent overseer of the &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_kernel&quot;&gt;Linux kernel&lt;/a&gt;, will lose patience with someone who isn&#039;t as smart as he is and will belittle the person or the idea the person is putting forward in an email on the Linux kernel development mailing list.  This email will be posted on Slashdot.  Comments on Slashdot will be split 40-40-20 between &quot;So what? He&#039;s probably right,&quot; &quot;So what? It&#039;s not like he&#039;s your mother or anything,&quot; and &quot;Thank God Richard Stallman didn&#039;t say that.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;7. Slashdot will refuse to acknowledge my greatness&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;No matter how many times I try, Slashdot will continue to reject any article I submit for front page publication.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;8. Blogging will be renamed&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;All over the web, successful bloggers will decide that the name &quot;Blog&quot; sounds much too childish and unsophisticated to describe what they actually do.  They will spend the entire year debating what name should be used instead, and it will soon become clear that so many people do so many things with the bloggin medium that it&#039;s impossible to choose a name that encapsulates all of it.  By the end of the year a compromise will be reached and everyone will use &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Love_Symbol&quot;&gt;Prince&#039;s old &#039;Love&#039; symbol&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Despite this, everyone will still use the word &quot;blog.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;9. Video games will be blamed for everything&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jack_Thompson_%28attorney%29&quot;&gt;Jack Thompson&lt;/a&gt;, the Miami attorney who has spent the last ten years crusading against violence in video games, will blame video game violence for the war in Iraq, global warming, and the Democrats taking the House and the Senate.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;10. Ted Stevens will be vindicated&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Much to the surprise of almost everyone on the planet, &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ted_Stevens&quot;&gt;United States Senator Ted Stevens (R-Alaska)&lt;/a&gt; will be proven correct when he said that the Internet was a &lt;a href=&quot;http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Series_of_tubes&quot;&gt;Series of Tubes&lt;/a&gt;.  In an effort to increase the bandwidth available to internet users everywhere, Internet Service Providers will immediately lobby Congress to allow them to replace those tubes with Big Trucks.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;thus endeth the prognostication&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://eviscerati.org/node/26#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://eviscerati.org/taxonomy/term/3">Internet Culture</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 21 Dec 2006 06:00:04 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Christopher Wright</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">26 at http://eviscerati.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>The Incoherent Values of Technology Journalism</title>
 <link>http://eviscerati.org/node/9</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://superosity.com/d/20001228.html&quot;&gt;&lt;img src=&quot;http://eviscerati.org/files/images-evorg/sup20001228.png&quot; alt=&quot;Superosity by Chris Crosby&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
From &lt;a href=&quot;http://superosity.com&quot;&gt;Superosity&lt;/a&gt;, by Chris Crosby.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Over at &lt;a href=&quot;http://ubersoft.net&quot;&gt;Ubersoft.net&lt;/a&gt; I &lt;a href=&quot;http://ubersoft.net/?p=548&quot;&gt;took Infoworld to task&lt;/a&gt; for publishing a list of technology predictions for the coming year that were, as near as I could tell, mind-bogglingly &lt;strong&gt;lazy&lt;/strong&gt; in scope.  But &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.infoworld.com&quot;&gt;Infoworld&lt;/a&gt;, it appears, is only a minor-league player in this vast wilderness of hyperbole-riddled pablum, and they have been trumped by another publication whose recent proclamations are so egregious that I was compelled to take Eviscerati.org out of the mothballs a little early (I&#039;d planned on a 2007 revival) in order to do them justice.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.crn.com&quot;&gt;CRN&lt;/a&gt; bills itself as &quot;Vital Information for VARs and Technology Integrators.&quot;  One assumes, then, that the information it chooses to publish on its site is information that VARs and people who spend their time integrating technology absolutely &lt;strong&gt;must&lt;/strong&gt; have.  The truth of this I leave up to those VARs and technology integrators who actually read the publication, since I am neither -- unless compiling the most recent version of ndiswrapper on my Kubuntu Edgy laptop in order to get wireless access counts as &quot;technology integration.&quot;  Still, after picking up on this little tidbit from &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.slashdot.org&quot;&gt;Slashdot&lt;/a&gt;, I have to wonder if perhaps the VARs and technology integrators are getting their money&#039;s worth when they read this publication.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Like all publications that attempt to convince their loyal readers that they have their finger on the pulse of whatever part of society they are covering, CRN engages in end-of-year navel-gazing.  Of particular note this month is their &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.crn.com/sections/special/reports/poty06.jhtml?articleId=196603828&amp;amp;pgno=1&amp;amp;queryText=&quot;&gt;2006 Products of the Year&lt;/a&gt;, a Top Ten list that purports to tell you the ten most important products that were released in 2006.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One of those products? &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.crn.com/sections/special/reports/poty06.jhtml?articleId=196603828&amp;amp;pgno=9&amp;amp;queryText=&quot;&gt;Microsoft Vista&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;!--break--&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That&#039;s right.  Microsoft Vista, the operating system that was released to businesses &lt;strong&gt;eighteen days ago&lt;/strong&gt;, has been chosen as the &lt;strong&gt;top operating system of 2006&lt;/strong&gt;.  &lt;strong&gt;Eighteen days&lt;/strong&gt; of availability for this operating system that businesses &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.freeformdynamics.com/fullarticle.asp?aid=25&quot;&gt;aren&#039;t even that enthusiastic about adopting&lt;/a&gt; is enough for them to crown Vista the &lt;strong&gt;top operating system of 2006&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And when you read their article, you have to wonder if these poor VARs and technology integrators might be better served getting their information elsewhere.  When you read their article, it becomes increasingly clear that CRN&#039;s view of the technology landscape doesn&#039;t exactly mesh with a little something most people like to call &quot;reality.&quot;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;From the article:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;While debate rages over whether the five-year wait was worth it, the truth is Vista is pretty much the only game in town.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The above quote is 100% factually correct as long as you ignore &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.apple.com/macosx/leopard/index.html&quot;&gt;OS X&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.sun.com/software/solaris&quot;&gt;Solaris&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.freebsd.org&quot;&gt;BSD&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.openbsd.org&quot;&gt;BSD&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.novell.com/linux/&quot;&gt;Linux&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.redhat.com/&quot;&gt;Linux&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.xandros.com&quot;&gt;Linux&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.debian.org&quot;&gt;Linux&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.linspire.com&quot;&gt;Linux&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gentoo.org&quot;&gt;Linux&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mepis.com&quot;&gt;Linux&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.mandriva.com&quot;&gt;Linux&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.ubuntu.com&quot;&gt;Linux&lt;/a&gt; (and &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.kubuntu.org&quot;&gt;Linux&lt;/a&gt;), and a few other BSD&#039;s and Linuxes I missed along the line.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We &lt;strong&gt;might&lt;/strong&gt; be able to take the article&#039;s claims more realistically if they changed their justification slightly -- from &quot;pretty much the only game in town&quot; to &quot;pretty much the only game in town &lt;strong&gt;that buys enough advertising space for us to consider saying nice things about them&lt;/strong&gt;&quot; -- but as they haven&#039;t done that, we can only sit back and shake our collective heads as we wonder what they were smoking when they reached this decision, and whether or not it would be worthwhile to find that stash.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;No, the &lt;strong&gt;real&lt;/strong&gt; reason Vista made the list is because it is &lt;strong&gt;new&lt;/strong&gt; and it is &lt;strong&gt;shiny&lt;/strong&gt; and they thought &quot;hey, nobody ever got fired for writing about Microsoft&quot; (unless you&#039;re writing bad things, of course), and it didn&#039;t matter that it &lt;strong&gt;hasn&#039;t been in use in the corporate world long enough to determine whether it meets any or all of Microsoft&#039;s claims&lt;/strong&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Essentially, dear friends, Vista was a &quot;Product of the Year&quot; &lt;strong&gt;not&lt;/strong&gt; because it&#039;s good -- it&#039;s too early to tell that yet.  No, it was made a &quot;Product of the Year&quot; for 2006 because it was released in 2006.  If it had been released in 2007, it would have won a spot in the 2007 &quot;Product of the Year&quot; article, even if someone else released an operating system that never crashed, was immune to viruses, ran every program ever made flawlessly and was not only free, but came with a money-back guarantee.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Microsoft&#039;s standing in the industry of tech journalism is set in stone.  Microsoft will cease to be a darling in the industry of tech journalism &lt;strong&gt;only&lt;/strong&gt; after it has already been ground into dust by some other company, and then &lt;strong&gt;that&lt;/strong&gt; company will become the new media darling that can do no wrong.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Why? Because with a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.theregister.co.uk/&quot;&gt;few&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.gripe2ed.com&quot;&gt;notable&lt;/a&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pbs.rog/cringely&quot;&gt;exceptions&lt;/a&gt;, technology journals aren&#039;t interested in actually reporting technology-related news, or seriously researching new technology trends. By and large they exist for one reason only: &lt;strong&gt;to reassure the CTO that all the new technology he just bought was a good investment&lt;/strong&gt;.  Whether it was or not is irrelevant, of course.  In fact, as long as he can point to a media article ebulliently lauding the latest and greatest turnkey solution, it won&#039;t matter how much his employees in IT complain that it just isn&#039;t working the way it&#039;s supposed to.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Still, it&#039;s hard to blame them.  Who wants to read a publication filled with articles that tell you that your software doesn&#039;t work correctly, you paid too much for it, and it&#039;s a looming security hazard that will bring your company to its knees?  Well, there &lt;strong&gt;is&lt;/strong&gt; a market for that, but it&#039;s much smaller than the market that will pat companies on the head, tell them they&#039;re doing fine, all the while getting money and presents (oops -- I mean &quot;evaluation copies&quot;) from software and hardware companies.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In fact, I&#039;ve changed my mind about the entire thing: if companies will start bribing me (oops -- I mean &quot;sending me evaluation copies&quot;) then I&#039;ll be perfectly happy to come up with a top ten list and feature each bribe (silly me, of course I mean &quot;rigorously evaluated and extensively tested product&quot;) in it.  If I get more than ten items, I&#039;ll make it a top twenty list.  Or a top one hundred list.  Whatever works.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sure, it&#039;ll probably take some of the charm out of the site... on the other hand, I&#039;d probably post more.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://eviscerati.org/node/9#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://eviscerati.org/taxonomy/term/6">Technology</category>
 <pubDate>Tue, 19 Dec 2006 16:28:56 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Christopher Wright</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">9 at http://eviscerati.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>Something Stirs in the Forest</title>
 <link>http://eviscerati.org/node/24</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;A razor-blade masthead sits unused, deep in slumber.  It has slumbered for 11 long months in this abandoned corner of the web, an eternity by web reckoning, and none who wander by can say if it will ever wake again.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Many things that ought to attract the attention of the razor-blade masthead -- things with names such as &lt;em&gt;Network Neutrality&lt;/em&gt;, &lt;em&gt;GPL v3&lt;/em&gt;, &lt;em&gt;Microsoft/Novell Linux Patent Protection&lt;/em&gt;, and &lt;em&gt;Web 2.0&lt;/em&gt; -- fly past without fear.  It is not common, after all, for sites to die on the web, even sites with promise: it has claimed the lives of many bright and gleaming ideas, swallowed up the most enthusiastic and sincerely committed of endeavors.  Surely, these things say, the razor-blade masthead is dead, is gone like so many of the sites that have gone on before it.  See, they say, we will come to rest on its cold form, and yet it is unmoving: it is not sleeping, it is dead.  It will not awaken, for there is nothing from which to wake.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And so over time the razor-blade masthead is forgotten, lost in a jumble of tubes and wires... but mostly tubes, and very few trucks.  And the things that ought to fear the attention of the razor-blade masthead forget the razor-blade masthead: it fades into the scenery with all the other half-discarded projects, dreams, ideas and tinkerings that makes the foundation of the web.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But one day the razor-blade masthead moves: it yawns, stretches, opens a bleary eye and sees what has happened around it.  Then both eyes, wide with horror, see that the digerati run unchecked, amok, unhinged, and decidedly unkempt.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It bears some of the burden for this.  It swore to raise the hue and cry, and instead it took a nap.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It has been blunted by time, but the razor is still there.  It is dull, but recognizable, and a whetstone lies nearby.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is a sound of stone and spark, of steel sharpening steel, and then there is silence.  The trucks have arrived.  The tubes are in danger.  The weavers are revolting.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;All Hail the Eviscerati.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://eviscerati.org/node/24#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://eviscerati.org/taxonomy/term/1">All Hail the Eviscerati</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2006 18:08:57 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Christopher Wright</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">24 at http://eviscerati.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>What a Piece of Work is Man: With Turbulent and Dangerous Lunacy</title>
 <link>http://eviscerati.org/node/25</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img id=&quot;image64&quot; src=&quot;http://eviscerati.org/files/images-evorg/2006/11/bigoil_small.jpg&quot; alt=&quot;Donated by Jamie Robertson&quot; /&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Jamie Robertson of &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.clanofthecats.com&quot;&gt;Clan of the Cats&lt;/a&gt;, in a comic donated to Eviscerati.org...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://eviscerati.org/node/25#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://eviscerati.org/taxonomy/term/9">What a Piece of Work is Man</category>
 <pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2006 09:54:17 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Christopher Wright</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">25 at http://eviscerati.org</guid>
</item>
<item>
 <title>What a Piece of Work is Man: The Fruit to That Great Feast</title>
 <link>http://eviscerati.org/node/23</link>
 <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pokegravy.com/news.html&quot;&gt;&lt;img id=&quot;image53&quot; src=&quot;http://eviscerati.org/files/images-evorg/mohammeddanish.gif&quot; alt=&quot;Poke &amp;amp; Gravy, by Alex Salsberg&quot; /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
From &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.pokegravy.com&quot;&gt;Poke &amp;amp; Gravy&lt;/a&gt;, by Alex Salsberg.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Alex has five cartoons in all, and has made them available via links on a page that you must deliberately click to view (with warnings for those comics that depict Mohammed, to minimize any offense given to Shi&#039;a Moslems). The one posted here is my favorite of the lot.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
 <comments>http://eviscerati.org/node/23#comments</comments>
 <category domain="http://eviscerati.org/taxonomy/term/9">What a Piece of Work is Man</category>
 <pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 21:36:05 -0600</pubDate>
 <dc:creator>Christopher Wright</dc:creator>
 <guid isPermaLink="false">23 at http://eviscerati.org</guid>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>
